What does holiness look like today?

What does holiness look like in 2012?

I haven’t blogged for two months. There have been a combination of reasons for this, the major one being other more pressing priorities; however, another reason was that I felt challenged by a question posed around that time by Abraham Garrett ‘what would holiness look like today’.

I wanted to answer this question the next time I blogged but unfortunately a lot of other equally important stuff got in the way.

Now, in that no man’s land that lurks between Christmas and New Year, I have a small window of opportunity in which I can post my thoughts.

What does holiness look like today?

It’s a good question because it is difficult to find very much Wesleyan holiness teaching written in the last 100 years. I offer that time frame deliberately even though it discounts Brengle’s contribution; I do so because Brengle’s understanding of holiness was quite different from that held by people like Wesley, Palmer, Finney et al. I’m also discounting the contribution of people like Ed Read and Allister Smith (probably in their case a little unfairly) because all they really did was reproduce old teachings in a format more acceptable to their day. I’m deliberately discounting the teachings of men like Coutts – saints though they undoubtedly were – the holiness they taught bore little resemblance to that which came out of the holiness movement in the late 19th Century. The point I’m trying to make is that since the early 1900’s there have been no real prophets of holiness clearly championing the cause of entire consecration.

I think this is because no one has really tried to tackle the question posed by Abraham Garrett – ‘what does holiness look like today?’ We can all paint a picture of holiness in its 19th century guise (at least those who have studied it can) but what does it look like today. If I were to be holy in a way that would be recognisable to Wesley, Booth or Finney the picture painted would be unattractive and dour by today’s standards.

The adoption of their holiness would mean no Nike trainers, no Starbucks Coffee, no Superdry or Hollister T-Shirts, no TV (let alone cable), no movies, no summer holidays, no BBQs on the beach, draconian Sabbath observance, no meals out with friends and so I could go on. Now one might argue that this is the very reason why the church is in decline, that the existence of all of the above in our lives is an indication of worldliness out of control, a sign of apostasy and maybe even in some cases hypocrisy. Some would argue that it is only in outlawing all these fleshly distractions once more that we will see the revival we all so eagerly seek. However such a view seeks to perpetrate a Christianity based on our answer to the question – ‘what would Finney do’ or ‘what would Booth do?’ instead of on the basis of ‘what would Jesus do?’ It is this recognition that leads us into the heart of the answer to the question ‘what does holiness look like today’?

The truth is that holiness always looks like Jesus. Now I am not peddling the watered down holiness that has recently become fashionable, I am not saying that holiness is ‘to be like Jesus’. Far too many people give Christlikeness as a definition of holiness without having any proper perception of what Christ was really like. Yes Christ was gentle, kind, slow to anger, meek and mild but to show this side of his character only is as bad as presenting him with long blonde hair, blue eyes and surrounded by multi-coloured children in contemporary national dress!

Jesus was also poor, nomadic and homeless he was also angry (on one occasion even violent), frustrated, a party goer, a friend of sinners, someone who turned water into wine, a man who indulged himself at great expense when he allowed a woman of disreputable character to massage expensive perfume into his feet and he was also (by the standards of the religious leaders of his day) a law breaker. All in all Jesus was an unpredictable rebel.

So the question ‘what does holiness look like today’ really needs translating into what ‘would Jesus look like today’? And this question needs asking with a full awareness that the answer might not be what we expect.

To properly understand Jesus and thereby understand holiness we need to look not at his actions but at his motives. Holiness is not about works it’s about fruit. It’s never about what we do but it is always about what God produces in and through us. Remember, the devil can produce counterfeit works but he cannot produce counterfeit fruit. The odd healing here and there might well suit his purposes but the Devil has nothing to gain by making a Christian forgiving or patient!

“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognise them. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you, away from me, you evildoers!’ (Matthew 7:15-23)

Christ’s actions can predominantly be traced to several clear motives the most obvious being love. This love was an on-going three way transaction between himself, his Father and us. This motive manifested itself in a whole series of priorities which directed and governed Christ’s interaction with the world around him. Let’s just pause and consider them for a moment as they are also the hallmarks of contemporary holiness.

A hatred of hypocrisy – Jesus only ever condemned two groups of people according to the bible, paedophiles and hypocrites. Christ couldn’t abide hypocrisy and what a person thought about themselves very often (if not always) predetermined how he judged them and what he expected of them. The rich young ruler thought he was righteous and was commanded to give ‘all’ his wealth away. Zachaeus knew he was bad and only had to part with a fraction of his wealth. The Pharisee, Nicodemus, who approached Christ at night with the question ‘what must I do to inherit eternal life’ was told he must be ‘born again’, whereas the woman caught in adultery, cast before the feet of Jesus in the daytime, he didn’t just forgive but he actually refused to condemn. This was the Jesus who told the religious authorities of his day (the equivalent of you and me) that ‘tax collectors’ and ‘prostitutes’ (words synonymous with sinner) would enter God’s kingdom first.

A hunger for social justice –Jesus always saw people for what they were. This gift was never more obvious than when the person he beheld was a victim. Jesus often saw those traditionally depicted as sinners, not as bad people but as victims. Sometimes this innate compassion would merge with his hatred of hypocrisy – this was particularly true where God’s name or law was used to manipulate and take advantage of the poor and weak. Nowhere is this more evident than in the cleansing of the temple when righteous anger led to him overturning tables and making a whip.

A visible association with sinners–Jesus socialised with those whom he came to save. He was a ‘friend’ to sinners not in the sentimental way we sometimes apply that phrase but in the literal sense – he actually made friends with those who deliberately disobeyed God. He hung out with them and went to their parties and even employed them. When Jesus called Matthew he was (by the standards of his day) an active sinner, sitting in his booth collecting taxes. Matthew was an unrepentant and deliberate collaborator with the Romans who at the time Jesus called him, was using his position to further his own material wealth and social status.

An eager evangelist – let’s not forget that Jesus did all of this to maximise the opportunities he had for effective evangelism. It was at these parties, in these friendships, with these people that he shared the ‘good news of the kingdom’.

This is what Jesus looked like 2000 years ago and today we have no reason to suspect that he would look any different. Where would we find him? We would find him in the company of unbelievers, at the movies, at the football game, going to parties, in night clubs – enjoying their company – not for his own pleasure alone but in order that he might save them. On a Sunday I have no doubt that he would be at Church but his mission field would be beyond the sanctuary. Sunday might be a time for recharging his batteries but his real work would take place Monday to Saturday.

So back to the question – what should holiness look like today? Such a life should be motivated and empowered by God’s love clearly expressed in a selfless love for others. Its hallmarks will always be compassion rather than judgement, forgiveness rather than condemnation, understanding rather than prejudice. Does it wear designer t-shirts and trainers; does it go to Starbucks, hang out at the movies and watch football on a Sunday afternoon? If in doing so it cuts through those demonic barriers designed to separate the evangelist from the unsaved then yes it does! Does it present to the world a self-righteous, supercilious, puritanical and morbid persona or does it express a life ‘lived in all its fullness’?

Holiness like this does not set us free from the demands of sacrifice quite the contrary. How can I safely wander among ‘the sites that dazzle’ and ‘the tempting sounds’, how can I (metaphorically speaking) have my feet massaged by a prostitute and attend all night parties? Only when I have made a definite, heartfelt, Gethsemane-like surrender of my will, only when I have made a blood-sweated commitment not to sin, only when I am determined to wear the full of armour of God can I move safely in such dangerous territory. To attempt to set up a mission without such consecration would lead to abject failure and certain damnation.

Neither does holiness like this set us free from the demands of full consecration for it is only when ‘my all is in the Master’s hands for him to bless and break’ that my life can become ‘a cup overfilled, a table spread’ whereby ‘other souls refreshed and fed may share his life through mine.’

To be holy in 2012 is to be fully ‘in the world’ yet completely and utterly not ‘of it’.

This holiness and its rediscovery will prove to be the salvation of the Salvation Army.

Advertisements

About Andrew Bale

I am a Salvation Army Officer based in Southend on Sea in Essex, UK. I am passionate about personal holiness and how that is reflected in a 'career of interrupted victory over temptation.' I am married with 4 children (2 grown up and married, one at University and one about to start University.)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to What does holiness look like today?

  1. gary laws says:

    ‎”The point I’m trying to make is that since the early 1900′s there have been no real prophets of holiness clearly championing the cause of entire consecration.” I could not disagree more! It seems as if you are setting yourself up as having the sole authority to make such a pronouncement. I find that to be a bit arrogant and self serving. Sorry for the harsh words but the thought you are advancing could not be further from the truth!

    • ajbale61 says:

      Gary, which contemporary author would you turn to in order to construct a modern model for Wesleyan holiness?

    • ajbale61 says:

      …I’m also not sure how my comment is ‘arrogant or self serving’ I’m certainly not proclaiming myself to be such a champion. The comment is an honest and personal opinion which I know is shared by many others. Grace and peace, A.

      • Val says:

        I have carefully read this and I could not agree with you more. If we’re not in the places where sinners hang out and not willing to show them love and mercy as Jesus would then “how shall they hear if the preacher forbear or lack in COMPASSIONATE” zeal, or how shall hearts move with the Master’s own love without His annointing and seal.” I do not see anything at all of arrogance or self serving in this article, in fact, I see the opposite. This is a matter that we all need to be carefully examining ourselves, our motives etc about. Yes, we want revival but it will only come as we rely entirely on Christ the greatest example and mentor ever known who practised this in His everyday life. May He help us as we endeavour to do His will.

  2. David Cavanagh says:

    Excluding Coutts means you’ve excluded a major strand of modern holiness teaching…..Even if you want to stick with more “traditional” approaches, surely Shaw Clifton, Stephen Court, Matt Clifton and Geoff Ryan are worth consideration!

    • ajbale61 says:

      Coutts was a deeply spiritual and gifted teacher who was undoubtedly ‘full of grace’ but the ‘holiness’ he taught was not the same as that which came out of the 19th century holiness movement. The others you mention are all friends (with the exception of Geoff whom I have never met).

      Certainly Steve promotes holiness on the Internet and via AC and he has also co-written a book for young people on the subject. Shaw has also published works on holiness but the most notable of these ‘New Love’ was a compendium which included some writers who didn’t subscribe to Wesleyan holiness in its purest form. I know Matt very well and he would be flattered to be mentioned because he would be the first to admit that he is not a published author known for teaching Wesleyan holiness.

      None of these men, either on their own or collectively have provided us with sufficient material to come up with a contemporary picture of what holiness looks (or ought to look) like today. My short article is one suggestion, the picture painted is not meant to be definitive it is simply my thoughts on the subject.

      It would be great to look at models suggested by others.

      So, answer the question, what does holiness look like today?

      Grace and peace, A

  3. Peter Birch says:

    Hi Andrew,
    this is a well reasoned and thought provoking article, I would answer it by saying that it really does not matter what Holiness looks like, we might just have to be content with recognising it when we see it, and I am also certain that anyone in whom it is recognised would deny it in themselves.
    there is a clue in your writing – the paragraph that starts “Christ’s Actions…” for surely holiness can only be expressed in action – toward those in the fellowship (as expressed in Colossians Ch 3) and toward those (for want of a better word) outside of it as seen in the interactions of Jesus as you describe them, and even Jesus demurred when someone addressed him as “good”.
    Aristotle ( and I know he can hardly be described as contemporary) described “happiness” (the best but inadequate equivalent of the concept he was trying to address) as a virtuous activity of the soul, and I would humbly suggest that Holiness is the same – activity motivated by the Love of God, as Boon said in his hymn “your friends in your conduct His likeness will see”
    Beyond that, I do not see motives as being helpful, it is for God to see into a persons heart and make such judgements, not us, but we can see in ourselves a consistency in public and private that will make a difference, the fruit of the Spirit are action words after all.
    Best wishes, Peter

  4. Abraham says:

    Thank you for this article. You’ve dealt with many key issues upon the subject and I am grateful. I believe that we truly must recapture that spirit of loving obedience that leads us from the motive of love of God and love of others into the dark haunts of sin in this age. Yes into the bars, night clubs, and sporting events and other places like them, for the express purpose of loving the unlovable and reaching the lost, the last, and the least. I also fully agree that the only proper way this can be done is after having fully consecrated to God and received the baptism of the Blood and Fire and living in His presence, abiding in The Vine. My heart ache is my personal sins and selfishness that hold me back from such living worship of God. God help us live pure and win the world to Jesus!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s